BASIS OF COMPARISION
|
CLASSICAL SCHOLAR
|
HUMAN RELATION SCHOLAR
|
BEHAVIURAL SCHOLAR
|
POST BEHAVIOURAL SCHOLAR
|
CONTEMPORARY SCHOLAR
|
STUDY
organisation
|
Method was normative
i.e. “what ought to be”
prescriptive
based on experience
value loaded
not based on facts.
Lack scientificness
Lack universalism
claimed
they claimed their theories and principles are scientific. i.e. why
can be applied universally and in any field of public & private
administration. If applied will maximize the efficiency & economy &
production.
They said that organisation is formal.
No personal relation among the
employees. They should work on the basis of pre- determined rules and
regulation.
Thus they consider human being
on the basis of instrument of production.
Organisation completely close
Human being is economic man. i.e. can only be motivated by monetary
incentives.
Complete rational. i.e. who can choose the best and can full fill his
own interest at the best.
Theories and principles of management with the emphasis on the
function of executives like CEO, MANAGER, etc.
CLASSICAL AUTHORITY-
POSITIONAL
Authority lies in the post/position of the incumbent.
-coercive i.e. forcefulness
The chief of the organisation has ultimate authority.
Therefore the subordinate get authority due to deliberation of
authority by chief.
Conflict:- classical were
almost against the conflict they consider it as destructive for the organisation.
That is why they tried that no any conflict should emerged in org. if emerges
then supressed forcefully dominance method of conflict resolution
Flow of authority TOP to
DOWNWARD.
|
Maximum of production
They were also tried to increase economy & efficiency.
Observation
Observe the behaviour of organisation.
They concluded that human being in the organisation work on the basis
of the social relation not the basis of pre- determined rule and regulation.
Organisation is informal.
Completely open.
Human being is a social man
i.e. can only be motivated by psychological aspects not by the economic
incentives.
Human being is complete irrational.
|
Based on empirical study
Based on positivism
The knowledge that can inject through the body senses empirically is
truth. That is why factual analysis.
Classical studies was highly un scientific because that was based on
the experiences. therefore he suggested that the need is scientific study and
that can achieve through empirical study.
Empirical study emphasis “what
is” i.e. the reality or actuality of the organisation.
Organisation is both formal and informal.
Half open half closed.
Human being is administrative man can be motivated by both intrinsic
(work) and extrinsic (social).
Human being is bounded rationality (limited)choses satisficing
(satisfactory + suffice)
Value free idea i.e. scientific idea
|
It is based on NEW PUBLIC
ADMINISTRATION. In the study of new public administration the need is
relevant knowledge whether it is science or not does not matter that should have values, Can being
changed should establish social equity in society
|
It is based on CHOICE OF PUBLIC.
---liberalisation
---privatization
---globalisation
Challenge to public administration is:-
1) Cope
of the fast changing global environment.
2) Effective
supplies of good & services to
uplift the deprived section of society
|
THEORIES
August 01, 2016
0